since having it in the vehicle lulls people into a false sense of security...
So it is operator error? But then you ignorantly blame the car once again:
The car is at fault for not having a cutoff at around 110 like other cars do.
Liar. Tesla AI has a cut off way below 90 mph, it is the fucking (((law))), you blathering retard. Once the software is hacked then it becomes an operator error. So you are blaming a big fucking lie for user error. You make idiots look intelligent. Nice trick.
You don't think it should be banned from public roads... blah, blah, (more false assumptions), blah...
Liar. I think Tesla should be investigated under a military tribunal for treason and espionage.
Ah, welcome back! I was afraid you'd left us, but it's nice to see you have returned with another round of insults. Insults prove your superiority when dealing with others.
It's ok. I know you love Tesla, otherwise you'd have never bothered replying. But let's start off once again.
The problem I'm seeing here is you keep taking each of my comments within their own context, instead of building upon them. So let's try to work this one out using what we've learned already.
So it is operator error? But then you ignorantly blame the car once again:
It's both. Please try to understand that multiple factors can come into play here.
Liar. Tesla AI has a cut off way below 90 mph
No one said AI here except you. Most cars will rev-limit their speed to around 110-120MPH.
it is the fucking (((law))), you blathering retard.
Source for this one please.
Liar. I think Tesla should be investigated under a military tribunal for treason and espionage.
No you don't. You wouldn't even bother replying if you thought that way. You're shilling for Tesla hard here.
But again, welcome back. So...I await your next round of insults. Have a safe holiday, please.
(post is archived)