That was a great article. No wonder they deleted it, can't have people seeing the truth. I'm surprised it was allowed to be published to begin with.
Many western nations assumed that increasing ethnic and cultural diversity through immigration would be beneficial.
I would quibble with this. It might be the 'official narrative', but they knew exactly what the results would be. This societal destruction was intentional.
So, is excluding certain people from one’s society a requirement? The short answer is absolutely. The long and more reasonable answer is if you do let people into your country then make sure they hold similar values — compatibility. Make sure they want to fit into your society fully and completely — cohesion.
Hence the push for merit-based integration.
If a country wants diversity, expect enclaves to form. This may work out fine in the long run, as it has in Switzerland. Or it may turn into a bloody mess, as it repeatedly does in the Balkans. The other option is low diversity.
Denmark had the latter. It worked well. Now, it wants it back again and that will require its immigrants to integrate. Those who don’t will have to leave.
This is the correct solution.
(post is archived)