Awesome, so you agree that drug dealers provide more for society than retards. At least we’re sorta getting on the same page, although I don’t think drug dealers should need to exist. It’s not the job of a government to tell people what they can and can’t ingest, drug dealers and the surrounding violence shouldn’t have any reason to exist. Assuming there isn’t a nanny government telling you what to do, drug dealers are the same as any other business owner (you’d be able to buy cocaine at the gas station) and actually are good for the economy.
But that’s a totally different conversation. Imported brutes living off welfare are net negatives, same as retards. You seem to agree despite the drug dealing strawman you made
that's money you take from the economy, you give them, and they reinject it in the economy
I think even most children understand that taking something away and then putting it back is not a gain
I tell you what, between our retards and all the drug trafficking shitskins, if I had to eliminate one group over the other, it would be the shitskins
Simple as!
And I don't give a shit about the impact on "the economy"
Now it goes without saying that if I had to choose between my handicapped cousin and you, if I had to decide which one of you has to die to save the other... Well, I would do exactly what you would do
I would keep my cousin, because she has more value to me
Simple as...
>I think even most children understand that taking something away and then putting it back is not a gain
I don't think like a child...
I don't think like a child...
Using the argument that it’s beneficial to pay welfare to reinject it into the economy disagrees
I tell you what, between our retards and all the drug trafficking shitskins, if I had to eliminate one group over the other, it would be the shitskins
It’s also childish to look at a list of 100 problems and say “Number 59 isn’t a problem because there are 58 worse problems!”
I would keep my cousin, because she has more value to me
Yes, making political and financial decisions based on emotion and personal desire rather than long term stability for the community has been the downfall of pretty much every powerful civilization in history. I hope it makes you happy to be among them
Using the argument that it’s useful to pay welfare to reinject it into economy disagrees
Why do you think they do it? Charity? Nah, it's book trick, it's artificial stimulation of the economy, artificial spending, velocity of money, but shhhhh it's a secret...
It’s also childish to look at a list of 100 problems and say “Number 59 isn’t a problem because there are 58 worse problems!”
Sorry to break it to you but life is a matter of priority
Yes, making political and financial decisions based on emotion rather than long term stability has been the downfall of pretty much every powerful civilization in history. I hope it makes you happy to be among them
If I have a superior net worth to one of your relatives, and you have to choose between me and the said relative, you would choose to spare my life and let your relative die, because I have a superior net worth????
That's what you are saying?
Are you insane?
(post is archived)