WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://twitter.com/cancivlib/status/1585289464250863617?s=46&t=JdzJ6xePLzNP8-M5q-G5bg

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

They'll agree that it went too far, but watch as absolutely fucking nothing happens to the people who did it. Nothing will happen to them, it will just be forgotten and they will go on drawing their pay cheques and eventual pensions.

[–] 1 pt

literally ZERO context of what the injunction was

[–] 0 pt

Summary The Attorney General and the Chief Medical Officer of Nova Scotia (the “Province”) obtained an ex parte injunction enjoining illegal public gatherings prohibited by a Public Health Order issued by the Chief Medical Officer. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (“CCLA”) was granted intervenor status and sought an inter partes hearing. The Province successfully applied to have the injunction dissolved as no longer necessary and the Supreme Court refused to consider an inter partes because the matter was moot. The CCLA then successfully applied to extend time to appeal the original ex parte injunction.

Was already in the comments.

[–] 1 pt

What injunction are we talking aboot?

[–] 4 pts

"

From a quick scan of results from https://search.brave.com/search?q=nova+scotia+injunction+may+14+2021 it looks like the injunction was issued to block protests by people opposed to covid restrictions.

[–] 0 pt

ah, yeah that's some bullshit

[–] 2 pts

Sounds like the one that criminalized anyone from waving flags on overpasses, claiming that kind of gathering surely blocks highway traffic and is not suitable for protests.

[–] 1 pt

Summary: The Attorney General and the Chief Medical Officer of Nova Scotia (the “Province”) obtained an ex parte injunction enjoining illegal public gatherings prohibited by a Public Health Order issued by the Chief Medical Officer. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (“CCLA”) was granted intervenor status and sought an inter partes hearing. The Province successfully applied to have the injunction dissolved as no longer necessary and the Supreme Court refused to consider an inter partes because the matter was moot. The CCLA then successfully applied to extend time to appeal the original ex parte injunction.