Someone using their "jump to conclusions" mat? The context of this is not a threat of lockdowns, he never says something like "if we don't hit xxx vaccinated we will have lockdowns", he's suggesting that if the C ratio (infection rate) stays down (however society accomplishes that) we won't need another round of lockdowns. In his mind vaccines are a valid approach - though most here would disagree.
"if we don't hit xxx vaccinated we will have lockdowns",
Except he does. Fuck right off you retarded troon. He says "need" meaning necessary, equals 'will happen' under the conditional of "80-85-90 percent on up to date jew mRNA bio-weapon shots". Not only are you wrong, you're making yourself sound more retarded.
- Always a pleasure, always consistent in messaging.
(post is archived)