WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

425

A couple of theories being bandied about as to why:

1) Senate vote wasn't looking good for him

2) The protests would have topple their government

3) Used it as a non-confidence vote to see who is loyal without having to actually hold a vote and trigger an election, which he would lose if it were held today

Any other suggestions please go ahead

A couple of theories being bandied about as to why: 1) Senate vote wasn't looking good for him 2) The protests would have topple their government 3) Used it as a non-confidence vote to see who is loyal without having to actually hold a vote and trigger an election, which he would lose if it were held today Any other suggestions please go ahead

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Do you always go off on completely unrelated tangents when someone calls you out for saying something as ridiculous as your original comment?

[–] 0 pt

My original comment made perfect sense. It only sounds ridiculous to the deranged weirdos who unfortunately seem to be in the majority.

My reply is not unrelated at all. I directly addressed your poor grammar and your mindless reply.

I'm not sure how that isn't completely obvious, but once again, you are among the deranged, so I am not really surprised anymore.

I don't really look at people as similar to me or even as the same species anymore.

[–] 0 pt

You presented your original comment as the one and only answer when in reality, it was you guessing that's what it may have been. Your inflated sense of self worth is reaching Turdeau levels. You fucking faggot.

[–] 0 pt

I have no idea what you're talking about and am in no way interested in going back to read the full comment thread. I just don't care anymore, man.