Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

600

A couple of theories being bandied about as to why:

1) Senate vote wasn't looking good for him

2) The protests would have topple their government

3) Used it as a non-confidence vote to see who is loyal without having to actually hold a vote and trigger an election, which he would lose if it were held today

Any other suggestions please go ahead

A couple of theories being bandied about as to why: 1) Senate vote wasn't looking good for him 2) The protests would have topple their government 3) Used it as a non-confidence vote to see who is loyal without having to actually hold a vote and trigger an election, which he would lose if it were held today Any other suggestions please go ahead

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (25).
[–] • 0 pt

That implies that you would have started thinking, which has never happened in your entire life because you're not even a person.

[–] • 0 pt

I only thought you were an idiot you didn't have to confirm it.

[–] • 0 pt

Blah, you've just been waiting for someone to say that to, haven't you been? Cliches and popular new comebacks are boring.

I wonder if you can even tell that you just elided two sentences together and pretended that they were one, but since illiteracy is the norm these days rather than the exception, I doubt that you even recognize it.

[–] • 0 pt

Do you always go off on completely unrelated tangents when someone calls you out for saying something as ridiculous as your original comment?