I believe that there is a simple, but yet even more sinister explanation. I think that this was not a planned false flag and as such they were caught off guard and don't have the media campaign prepped and ready to go. More problematic to those who would try to capitalize on a real, unplanned shooting is that this one does not follow the script... how to do say "only cops should have guns." when it was a cop that was the shooter?
I challenge you to examine the actual facts that we actually know about this shooting, not the story they tell us to believe. All we really know is that the Canadian federal police force (RCMP) rolled into a tinny back water town with armored vehicles. The RCMP issues warning of an active shooter situation and directed people to not enter an entire section of the town. Several buildings burned down. There are several dead bodies. The RCMP arrested the local small town cop and claim that he went on a shooting rampage. That's all we really know. If we look at the the 'official' story we don't know anything else... the only difference is that the last point, 'small town cop goes on shooting rampage' is presented as fact. No motive, no reason, no explanation. They were caught by surprise as well. There is no prepared story and because of the remote location the local deep state actors have less support and infrastructure on hand to spin a believable story.
Consider for a moment an alternate explanation. Small town cop gets sick and fed up with extra-judicial national lock downs and tells his superiors that he will not enforce them but foolishly decides to stay in the chain of command and does not go to the press. He has a small group of trusted locals that agree with him and they collectively decide to practice a little civil disobedience. The powers that be decide to squash this quick before others get ideas and they send the jack boot thugs (RCMP) to assert their authority. The RCMP get there but find not just a single cop that they need to take into custody but rather an armed militia who are not interested in coming quietly. A firefight ensues and the militia is routed because they brought rifles to a mechanized armor fight. They scatter to their homes... the RCMP track them down and burn them out. The jack boots immediately use a go-to excuse: Active Shooter! ...and now they are scrambling to pull together a plausible cover story.
This before would have seemed proposturous to me, but now sadly seems very plasible.
The "shooter" was not a cop though, they say he was a denture technician. However, the rest of your narrative is plausible. I was strange as fuck how he supposedly had a fake cop car and uniform and this went on for 12 hours. However, I would like to offer another idea.
I have spent the better part of a few hours looking into the backgrounds of the shooter and victims and their photos. I did reverse image searches and went through what I could find on social media. Nothing. No facebook, linkedin, twitter, or instagram. There was that police officer victims facebook page but nothing was in her photos. If anyone else can find anything, I'm interested. My thought is that this whole thing is some kind of scam. I think the names and faces are made up. I would wager that no shooting actually happened.
The digital profiles are being scrubbed because he WAS a cop. When the story first broke the news was very clearly identifying Gabriel Wortman as a member of the local PD. He had a police cruiser because he was a cop.
Interesting. Have you seen or ? I have personal contact with these people so I'm going to have to take back my other statement. It sounds like you may really be on to something, brother.
Good theory.
'small town cop goes on shooting rampage' is presented as fact
Did they change their story since yesterday? What about the denturist?
Yes, they changed the story. The stories identified Gabriel Wortman as a member of the local PD. That is why he had a police cruiser.
That connects a lot of the dots.
(post is archived)