Man, you'd think he's the literal antichrist considering the consensus of backlash against him across the internet. He's seriously one of the people most feared by the soyboys of the population control department of tptb.
He's a communist, a 5th columnist of the anti-NWO groups, and a gatekeeper edgelord. Most of his stances are Frankfurt school anti-thesis steering points to keep people on their couch. Basically, he's another head of the controlled opposition beast like Alex Jones or Qanon.
Nobody wishesshould wish ill will on anybody, but people who are in the know about him are affirmed that there was something not quite right about idolizing him. Unfortunately, this may sound like schadenfreude and for some may actually be that. Personally, I hope he can get it together long enough to clean up his life and get off the drugs (that he on multiple occasions has pushed on others). However, I also hope he just goes away so others won't be tempted by his edgelord radical individualism bullshit.
No one is perfect and I think too many of us suffer from manufactured consensus.
Peterson is beneficial because he's helping moralize young men. Plenty of people that are more helpful than not have faults man.
A perfectionist frame isn't worth your time, nor anyone else's.
I'm not looking for perfect, I'm looking for non-traitors and . He has consistently and knowingly lied about history and fed affirmation to sobbing boys, and soothed them with the less than adequate medicine of Radical Individualism.
A lot of drug pushers have helped patients with their pain management. At the same time we have an opiod crisis.
I don't hate the guy at all and appreciate willingness to stand against compelled speech, but see that his flawed approach has been an overall negative for Canada.
Also, he's a leaf so he's clearly demoralized heavily, which offers an explanation for his pharmaceutical use.
He was clearly poisoned a while ago and I actually think he backed off from his aim after that a bit.
I don't see how he's communist nor a gatekeeper and comparing him to the Q operation seems lackadaisical of you.
It's weird how I encounter people like you, only to see you've fallen for the demoralizing bait being cast against the movement. I'm disappointed you haven't given it more time, although I have a couple of years invested in it so maybe that's where my willingness to defend it stems from.
Like I've told you before, the folly of man is doubt. The best way to remedy this folly is by promoting people or avenues for "hope" (which, as you know, is a concept I detest).
This is why you're told the secret is certainty.
It's worth it to root for moralization and I'm going to hazzard a guess that you're more than familiar with such a concept. How else do you expect to combat the Loosh farm(s)?
I don't see how he's communist nor a gatekeeper and comparing him to the Q operation seems lackadaisical of you.
There is overwhelming evidence of this actually. There is a difference between therapy and self empowerment. I'm not calling the guy evil nor am I calling for any ill will. My issue is that he is a magnet for others to idolize which detracts from their ability to turn away form the soothing therapy sessions and truly work on their community and nation.
In the same way, pain killers tone the pain of our injuries so we don't get rest and often get stuck on the medication. Pain is nature telling you what's broken and when masked we forget that our bodies or psyche or nation need to be fixed. Yes, such things can help in the short term, but can become addictive.
fallen for the demoralizing bait
I'm far from demoralized, in fact I'm about empowerment. The issue of our time is enslavement through affirmation. Some of what he is offering is great and I've even recommended his book to many (read it myself actually). The problem is people get stuck on an orbit rather than really healing. While the bulk of sad males are off in the corner cleaning their room, they are not pushed into the deeper realm of interdependence (the stage beyond dependence and independence). Jordan Peterson pushes for step 2 (independence) but actually pushes away from step 3 (interdependence) which is actually harmful.
the folly of man is doubt
I know this may seem backwards, but in actuality the folly of man is infantalization (which is a form of being trapped in a dogma by non-validated beliefs). It may seem complicated, but if you shed that which you believe is (at least temporarily) that youcan reach the bounds of what is Truth and find greater truths that the previous beliefs chained you from seeing. One of the biggest issues of our time in a sense is TYPE-II error, which is the act of accepting that which we cannot reject. This is a problem because we will never know even the probability of a mistake without fully dismantling and inspecting all things (an impossibility with large systems). Confirmation bias is what happens when we fall into a valley of believe which stems on affirmation of our senses and hiding from the temporary chaos we feel (or think we feel) from not knowing something for certain. Flip a coin and we may see just heads or tails, but there are other alternatives we often don't see. Much of the time we, as people, see things as a dichotomy that isn't real. Always remember there can be alternatives we have not yet envisioned, hence acceptance without truly knowing all options is folly. So, with this, the only real power and control we have is to look to reject that which is unlikely, and the chance of making this error is that probability of what we are rejecting.
Note that all "scientific" theories are based on this principal and when a theory is correlated to be the norm, we do well from it. However, the evolution of theories is a product of when the theory becomes untenable we are forced to seek new alternatives to correlate with which changes the statistics and allows us to reject the status quo and have a paradigm shift.
I'm not trying to force this line of thinking per se, but what we know for certain is a folly and accepting things without true witness, validation or testing is folly.
It's worth it to root for moralization and I'm going to hazzard a guess that you're more than familiar with such a concept. How else do you expect to combat the Loosh farm(s)?
There is only one truth and god, and it is OBJECTIVE REALITY. We mustn't compare ourselves to each other without the true objective reference that is. This Loosh thing you're talking about is when we tap into the power/privilege/comparison difference between ourselves and other people. This results in a transfer of energy in the comparison. The reason Loosh happens is because people focus on this comparison instead of comparison of the objective data. By losing this connection we tune into a master/servant power struggle which is only localized and is in fact a source of much of the demoralization of our society.
I do not judge Jordan Peterson as a man (please see my previous responses with this in mind), but point out that he is flawed in his logic and not an overall benefit to what our culture in Canada needs. He is in fact a packaged "solution" of the Hegelian Dialectic trap and in a way provides a nice, soothing box for agitated ones to rest in rather than dealing with the true disease. His line of thinking is right out of the NWO playbook, and cohorts with many pushing the same false antithesis points of subversion. Radical Individualism is one of these ideas from the Frankfurt school to indeed subvert or keep those who would rise up from doing so.
(post is archived)