Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

145

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

That there would be a trial at all for something so petty leads me to believe there will be trials for eye-rape too.

[–] • 1 pt

And I wonder if there was a camera in the elevator. I don't see how you could even arrest anyone based solely on her word.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Wrap around sunglasses solve that potential problem, as long as you're not a drooler.

[–] • 0 pt

Ya , on the surface it seems pretty silly.on the other hand I’m going to bet it’s a “new” canadian.hence a trial.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

There would be no trial for muh dicks, it's not the Trudeau way. If there is, I expect they'll soon drop the charges.

[–] • 1 pt

Ya you could be (and probably are ) right with the Trudeau/muh dickin.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

it's all accusations, it has not been proven in court

situations like this is exactly why apartment buildings need 24/7 cameras inside the halls and elevators with facial recognition

now a days, unless there is evidence, we can't take a women's word that it actually happened, but there is also a lot of pervert men out there,

so it's extremely difficult to know what really happened from both parties,

if apartment buildings had cameras everywhere, we'd know exactly what happened and force the guilty party right away to move out

if we allow accusations against men so easily, all the good men in powerful positions such as politics will be jailed easily,

im sure its already happening