WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

699

https://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB311/2025

They frame it as protecting women for sympathy brownie points. But I support it because it is not accommodating the idea that transwomen are women. They should be treated different, more like the (not women) they are,

https://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB311/2025 They frame it as protecting women for sympathy brownie points. But I support it because it is not accommodating the idea that transwomen are women. They should be treated different, more like the (not women) they are,
[–] 1 pt 13d

More lying Cal. horse shit. There are NO (yes Zero) transgenders, male or female. No amount of insanity or mutilation will make a man into a woman or a woman into a man. The 'seclusion' should be for pure insanity.