I don't understand why they won't just take them into their own homes...
I don't understand why they won't just take them into their own homes...
the residents should 'give the project a chance'.
They've seen or heard other such projects that created more problems. You know, once this gets started, it will only exacerbate the already bad problem.
the homeless people would be 'essentially living in an apartment' with support staff available to help them at all hours.
Right. But what about helping the local residents when these homeless people start harassing the taxpayers or doing drugs?
rough sleepers
LOL. Is that a euphemism for homeless?
suffer from fentanyl addiction.
The "rough sleepers" aren't suffering from fentanyl addiction, the taxpayers are suffering due to the repercussions.
>the residents should 'give the project a chance'.
They've seen or heard other such projects that created more problems. You know, once this gets started, it will only exacerbate the already bad problem.
>the homeless people would be 'essentially living in an apartment' with support staff available to help them at all hours.
Right. But what about helping the local residents when these homeless people start harassing the taxpayers or doing drugs?
>rough sleepers
LOL. Is that a euphemism for homeless?
>suffer from fentanyl addiction.
The "rough sleepers" aren't suffering from fentanyl addiction, the taxpayers are suffering due to the repercussions.
The voted for that. They just never thought that it would be brought into their safe spaces.
The voted for that. They just never thought that it would be brought into their safe spaces.
Milbrae is not San Francisco. Near, but not in.
Milbrae is not San Francisco. Near, but not in.
(post is archived)