Sugar isn't "toxic" though. Candy can't exist without sugar, but it can exist without toxins. It's not up to the law to limit what you are allowed to have. But it is technically their job to keep poison out of the food supply.
Sugar isn't "toxic" though. Candy can't exist without sugar, but it can exist without toxins. It's not up to the law to limit what you are allowed to have. But it is technically their job to keep poison out of the food supply.
Sugar isn't "toxic" though.
I have been off sugar for two years now and I beg to differ. The amount of things sugar does to your body is unbelievable until you stop eating it and see how much your health improves. While it may not be the textbook definition of toxic, it is a poison to the body.
>Sugar isn't "toxic" though.
I have been off sugar for two years now and I beg to differ. The amount of things sugar does to your body is unbelievable until you stop eating it and see how much your health improves. While it may not be the textbook definition of toxic, it is a poison to the body.
I'm not saying it isn't bad. I noticed a hell if a difference when I gave up soda and energy drinks. I'm just saying it's not literal poison like some of the other stuff our government allows in our food.
I'm not saying it isn't bad. I noticed a hell if a difference when I gave up soda and energy drinks. I'm just saying it's not literal poison like some of the other stuff our government allows in our food.
(post is archived)