Why would we assume fraud did not decide the vote, when there is no reason at all, of any kind, for the Democrats not to commit election fraud? They've already seen in a national election that they can get away with any amount of fraud, and no consequences. Why wouldn't they commit fraud in California?
Why would we assume fraud did not decide the vote, when there is no reason at all, of any kind, for the Democrats not to commit election fraud? They've already seen in a national election that they can get away with any amount of fraud, and no consequences. Why wouldn't they commit fraud in California?
I've been inspired to create a new flair and label this, "controlled opposition".
I've been inspired to create a new flair and label this, "controlled opposition".
(post is archived)