You wrote :
This is one of those 'let the market decide' things. Zone it as residential. Let people build however they'd like.
Those are the words I responded to. Others also read your words my way.
Your words are your words. I am not wrong. You said people can ignore zoning laws voters enacted and "Let people build however they'd like."
Now you backpeddle your confusing words.
Your words are your words. I am not wrong. You said people can ignore zoning laws voters enacted and "Let people build however they'd like."
No I did not.
I specifically said zone it as residential and let people build however they like INSTEAD OF creating new residential zoning rules where there are 60 flavors of what residential zoning means. The context of the news is CA banning certain types of building within residential zones. I should not have to explain this to you because we all read the same exact articles. Keep it to the 3 zones and let the market decide everything else: business, industrial, residential.
You fucked up. Just admit you were wrong and move on. No need for this ego stroking thing.
I specifically said zone it as residential and let people build however they like
That's infringing on the property rights of neighboring property owners. If it's going to be legal for people to build however they want, it has to also be legal for people to block certain types from moving in to the neighborhood.
That's infringing on the property rights of neighboring property owners.
I do understand what you're saying. I really do. But those rights do not exist if there is no regulations. Capisci?
(post is archived)