WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

964

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

The manged decline continues.

[–] 2 pts

In the Kelly Turnbull (kellyturnbull.com) book series, California has collapsed to the point where the leadership is forced to bow to China to survive. They give them captured military hardware, intelligence, etc. Scary how close to reality that outcome is looking.

[–] 3 pts

At least we're not speaking German!

😅

It really is scary how fast things are changing.

[–] 2 pts

At least we're not speaking German!

I'm good: "Ein bier, bitte."

What else is there?

[–] 4 pts (edited )

I had read about this a couple of years ago, but I never thought the wealthy and the upper middle class would ever let it happen—Lo and behold Commifornia has done it! I guess when they let LA, Frisco and the beaches turn into bum-saturated dystopian fields of shit and needles, it was only a matter of time. Congratulations on being only 1 of 3 places in America worse than NYC!

[–] 2 pts

They want CA to turn to crap. There is only administrative approval (no hearings) and this will encourage building out backyards into low income housing. There goes the neighborhood. Of course if you live in zones for farm (or winery like Newsome and Pelosi) then you're not allowed to divide your land for low income houses.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-richest-nancy-pelosi-vineyard-story.html

The rich just want the poor off their beaches and into middle class (soon to be slum) neighborhoods. The government will give rent vouchers no doubt to fill the newly subdivided lots.

[–] 2 pts

normally I would be in favor of letting people build on their own land the way they want with less government. But in this case no

Why? The people behind this bill openly talk about it being about ending segregation...(I won't even start on a rant about how that is BS) 2. This law combines with 2 other laws that show it isn't about ending homelessness but rather gov owned and controlled housing.

Those are newsoms eviction moratorium that is still in effect until the end of this month Sept 2021 (unless he extends it whenever he feels like it) And SB1079- this law makes it so that if a property is being foreclosed on it doesn't go straight to the free market, it goes first to any residents who were living there, (they're probably broke if they were renters) 2. someone looking to make it their primary residence (everyone is leaving the state) or 3. Other certain non profit entities ******<---- That last one is key

Those non-profits are low income state funded or federal funded housing entities. link:https://www.dailycal.org/2020/09/30/ca-gov-gavin-newsom-signs-housing-bills-announces-additional-funding-for-homekey-project/

So step 1: declare that people can't go to work in low income jobs Step 2 declare that they can't be evicted by their landlords Step 3: Wait for all small landlords to go bankrupt or many of them Step 4:When they sell their forclosed properties make sure the government funded housing programs get right of first refusal to buy the property Step 5: Make it ok to develop that land when it wasn't ok for decades up till now and take away local land control

Now the gov gets to own the roof over your head too.

And yes this crap is very about F-white people. Low income housing programs always, always make stuff about race. The people behind this and most low income housing stuff always hate the idea of white people having communities.

below is a fun list of a bunch of recently signed califonia RE related laws.

https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/28/governor-newsom-signs-legislation-boosting-housing-production-in-california-to-fight-affordability-crisis/

[–] 1 pt

I wonder if there's an exemption for single family houses that would likely house 8 families of illegals

[–] 0 pt

This is one of those 'let the market decide' things. Zone it as residential. Let people build however they'd like.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Re the market and let people build how they like - people bought into nice single family home neighborhoods. They worked hard to get the dream. There are certain ethnicities that like to make money and will RUIN someone's home value instantly by building high density low income (small sq ft) apartments out of their lot. Imagine the usual neighborhood street, and a home in the middle of the street builds out by dividing their home into 4 units as per the law. Now, homes on either side of that monstrosity, homes behind that monstrosity and homes on the opposite side of the street have their home value destroyed. Now people want to move out before their home value plummets. A new slum is born. Government then pays the rent vouchers to the welfare cases who can't pay any amount of rent no matter how low, and CA workers pick up the bill in tax and lose value in their single family homes until they too are poor.

Then you have dem exodus to your nice conservative state

https://www.ocregister.com/2014/08/12/chinese-homebuyers-seeking-security-in-oc/ "Most buyers prefer to congregate near existing Chinese enclaves in Irvine and the San Gabriel Valley communities of Arcadia and San Marino. But local agents specializing in overseas transactions say buyers now are diversifying...People like to invest...They spent a week in the new home before Lu’s father jetted back to work in China" Diversifying / invest= MAKE MONEY OFF OF REAL ESTATE

[–] 1 pt

WRONG.

White People PAY MONEY to get away from spics and niggers. Then socialists resent White zip codes and White schools.

THIS is to CHANGE VOTING.

Outlawing White Neighborhoods & Freedom of Association :

https://www.bitchute.com/video/amxXREPqYfyb/ https://archive.org/details/youtube-4xP9TjNj9C8

[–] 0 pt

Whew, lad. You didn't understand my point at all.

This is a new law that is clearly not letting the market decide.

Wait, I need to yell at you in "nil"-speak like you are to me:

WRONG!

Letting the market decide what type of residential zoning they want means not passing a law that restricts what type of residential housing is put in place. AKA, let the free market decide, don't pass laws deciding for the market.

[–] 0 pt

You wrote :

This is one of those 'let the market decide' things. Zone it as residential. Let people build however they'd like.

Those are the words I responded to. Others also read your words my way.

Your words are your words. I am not wrong. You said people can ignore zoning laws voters enacted and "Let people build however they'd like."

Now you backpeddle your confusing words.

[–] 0 pt

The 'market' is letting cities decide their own zoning. You are free to move outside a city into a city which zoning suits you.

[–] 0 pt

The 'market' is letting cities decide their own zoning.

No, cities zoning out to granular details is not letting the market decide. That's literally the government telling the market what type of residential housing is permitted in the residential zone.

[–] 0 pt

You are free to move outside a city into a city which zoning suits you.

[–] 0 pt

How about zone it single family and let people not buy there if they don't want to live with that?

Property rights aren't absolute. You can't move in next door and start burning tires because it's "your property." You're still shitting up the neighborhood, which is infringing on everyone else's property rights. Building nigger and spic dormitories isn't a property right.

[–] 0 pt

How about zone it single family and let people not buy there if they don't want to live with that?

But what about people who want to live there but don't want to live in a single family home? What if they want a condo?

You can let the people form their own cooperatives without interfering with the government. If people want a home owners' association (or land owners), they can form it and ratify it with municipal blessing.

If you haven't noticed, I'm not an authoritarian. I prefer to let the people decide. The government doesn't need to baby sit every list thing we do.

[–] 0 pt

If you haven't noticed, I'm not an authoritarian. I prefer to let the people decide. The government doesn't need to baby sit every list thing we do.

You are authoritarian, you just have a different opinion of who should be in authority. Rights that can be voted away by others are not rights. That's like leaving it up to your neighbors whether you're allowed to fly an American flag on your property or whether you're allowed to own firearms. It's no less authoritarian for a group of your neighbors to deny you your rights than it is for government to do the same.

[–] 0 pt

Time to start burning down new builds then in a single family neighborhood.