This is why California sucks, they try to codify every fad driven 'special need' into law way before there is any significant demand for it.
If demand necessitates a gender neutral section, retail will be incentivized to create them.
This is needless meddling. The state should stick to fixing the roads and the gross tax rate.
This is why California sucks, they try to codify every fad driven 'special need' into law way before there is any significant demand for it.
If demand necessitates a gender neutral section, retail will be incentivized to create them.
This is needless meddling. The state should stick to fixing the roads and the gross tax rate.
(post is archived)