WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

655

body .pure-g, body.dark .pure-g, body.day .pure-g{margin-top:0px}

This line works in day and dark but not normal

body .pure-g, body.dark .pure-g, body.day .pure-g{margin-top:0px !important;}

This line is required for all 3 themes to match up

Different themes, same code, different results

This is one example

This is 100% a bug with your code, just because it's front-end superficial doesn't mean you didn't fuck up the code

body .pure-g, body.dark .pure-g, body.day .pure-g{margin-top:0px} This line works in day and dark but not normal body .pure-g, body.dark .pure-g, body.day .pure-g{margin-top:0px !important;} This line is required for all 3 themes to match up Different themes, same code, different results This is one example This is 100% a bug with your code, just because it's front-end superficial doesn't mean you didn't fuck up the code

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] 0 pt (edited )

body .pure-g, body.dark .pure-g, body.day .pure-g{margin-top:0px}

This works in all 3 modes. (changed margin value to 100px so you can clearly see it working)

https://poal.co/s/Testsub/hot

This is 100% a bug with your code, just because it's front-end superficial doesn't mean you didn't fuck up the code

Just because you don't know how your browser behaves (caching) doesn't mean it's someone else's fault.

Not in FF it doesn't

[–] 0 pt

It does. You keep posting false reports because you're butthurt of the changes I made that "broke" your perfect custom CSS.

You're code is crap. Can't even ban people from a sub or make consistent CSS. If you spent as much time on the code as you do on moving posts the site might work properly

[–] -1 pt

shouldn't this be listed as code? Between <>? INCONSISTENT! INCONSISTENT?