That way they can actually see it through their narrow little eye slits.
That way they can actually see it through their narrow little eye slits.
Not tiny noodles, it looks that way because the chicken is huuuge
Not tiny noodles, it looks that way because the chicken is huuuge
To reduce cooking time, the thinner the noodle the faster the cooking, the lower the energy consumption, the lower the overall cost of a meal
Of course that's just conjecture on my part
To reduce cooking time, the thinner the noodle the faster the cooking, the lower the energy consumption, the lower the overall cost of a meal
Of course that's just conjecture on my part
Oh I meant the little rices
Oh I meant the little rices
Pic?
Pic?
Rice, the Asian pasta
Rice, the Asian pasta
You worked bullshit into the question, in violation of the typical format.
So in violation of the typical format, I will give you a normal answer:
Pasta that looks like rice is Orzo (en.m.wikipedia.org). But since that's Italian for barley, I assume it's actually supposed to look like barley.
You worked bullshit into the question, in violation of the typical format.
So in violation of the typical format, I will give you a normal answer:
Pasta that looks like rice is [Orzo](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orzo). But since that's Italian for barley, I assume it's actually supposed to look like barley.
Such accusations. I thought rice was pasta
Such accusations. I thought rice was pasta
It's tiresome not to be the bullshitter. When are we going back to the usual format?
It's tiresome not to be the bullshitter. When are we going back to the usual format?
You can always ask a question of your own, hot shot
You can always ask a question of your own, hot shot
Are you sure about that? (pic8.co)
[Are you sure about that?](https://pic8.co/sh/9DfbwS.jpg)
I'm talking about rice
I'm talking about rice
These are rice noddles.
These are rice noddles.
but rice is already a pasta
but rice is already a pasta
(post is archived)