You forgot an important point. He was under investigation by the DoJ for insider trading and monopoly.
Maybe some related (((Individuals))) involved were worried he would rat them out.
You forgot an important point. He was under investigation by the DoJ for insider trading and monopoly.
Maybe some related (((Individuals))) involved were worried he would rat them out.
You forgot an important point. He was under investigation by the DoJ for insider trading and monopoly.
Was not aware of that. Your second point ties in with what I said in #3, "lacking evidence" was partly me lacking / knowing about evidence of such illicit happenings.
>You forgot an important point. He was under investigation by the DoJ for insider trading and monopoly.
Was not aware of that. Your second point ties in with what I said in #3, "lacking evidence" was partly me lacking / knowing about evidence of such illicit happenings.
Your second point ties in with what I said in #3,
No, it doesn’t. It’s the opposite.
> Your second point ties in with what I said in #3,
No, it doesn’t. It’s the opposite.