![Typical Ball Fondlers [640x639 - 431KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/JLnn47.jpg){kind=link}
If you look closely enough, this message really just supports the lefts arguments at the end of the day. How? Look at the responses/options it leaves the left:
"Yes, thats why we need stricter lockdowns!"
Never make an argument that gives the other side ammo.
The argument here should be explicit rather than implicit, so the other side can't define in their response what the solution should be.
Instead of what we have, it should say explicitly: "if we can play ball, we obviously don't need masks."
They're then forced to 1. remain silent and lose, 2. shut down sportsball and piss off a bunch of people.
After that, which side looks like the reasonable and sane ones?
If you look closely enough, this message really just supports the lefts arguments at the end of the day. How?
Look at the responses/options it leaves the left:
"Yes, thats why we need stricter lockdowns!"
Never make an argument that gives the other side ammo.
The argument here should be *explicit* rather than *implicit*, so the other side can't define in their response what the solution should be.
Instead of what we have, it should say *explicitly*: "if we can play ball, we obviously don't need masks."
They're then forced to 1. remain silent and lose, 2. shut down sportsball and piss off a bunch of people.
After that, which side looks like the reasonable and sane ones?
(post is archived)