So tell me why this may not mean what it looks like it means.
So tell me why this may not mean what it looks like it means.
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-search/view/aHR0cHM6Ly9zYXNyY2RhdGFwcmRhdWVhYS5ibG9iLmNvcmUud2luZG93cy5uZXQvZGVjaXNpb25zLzIwMjIvMDgvVTIwMjI1NTQzRGVjaXNpb24yNTczMDgwN2JkMjhiMGY4LTU3N2UtNDk0Ni1iZTA3LTEzNzhjMGUyYzA1OTA5NDYxM2RiLThjMTEtNDU1MC04YzVmLTZkYjU0MzI5NjY1ZC5wZGY1/1/b1ed73e4-cc25-4073-9dbc-0f61a8bed47f/Annunziata%24%24Cinque%24%24Jetstar%24%24Airways%24%24Pty%24%24Ltd%24%24U2022%24%245543
The ruling, part 73, states that the dismissal was not unjust or unfair, and part 74 states the application for such is dismissed.
So it looks like the title is inaccurate?
The ruling, part 73, states that the dismissal was not unjust or unfair, and part 74 states the application for such is dismissed.
So it looks like the title is inaccurate?
clickbait fucking shit.
clickbait fucking shit.
because the title is flat out fucking false.
because the title is flat out fucking false.
I kind of gathered that after reading the document that was linked to me.
I kind of gathered that after reading the document that was linked to me.
(post is archived)