"I wouldn't have had one on me if I'd known I wasn't allowed to wear one," he said.
And therein lie the problem. Blind acceptance of these rules is why Australia may be lost.
> "I wouldn't have had one on me if I'd known I wasn't allowed to wear one," he said.
And therein lie the problem. Blind acceptance of these rules is why Australia may be lost.
or blind application. as soon as i read 'policewoman' i shook my head, of course the female is too stupid to think for herself and use common sense and realise that that law was not created to stop some cowboy in the country from wielding a tiny pocketknife. 'that's the law, now i fine you' the total thought process of the female drone.
or blind application. as soon as i read 'policewoman' i shook my head, of course the female is too stupid to think for herself and use common sense and realise that that law was not created to stop some cowboy in the country from wielding a tiny pocketknife. 'that's the law, now i fine you' the total thought process of the female drone.
If you can not apply a law blindly and get positive outcomes then the law is a bad law. You place the blame on the drone when you should place the blame on the process by which such a stupid rule came to be.
If you can not apply a law blindly and get positive outcomes then the law is a bad law. You place the blame on the drone when you should place the blame on the process by which such a stupid rule came to be.
(post is archived)