WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

450

Doctors will be free to prescribe Ivermectin under this government-independent scheme.

Pharmacies don't have to fear fines and penalties for filling a scrip for Ivermectin.

Healtcare is a fundamental human right and I don't see a problem with 2 parallel ones existing: one Allopathic/Rockerfeller which is the current Medicare and the other homeopathic under Friendly Societies.

Doctors will be free to prescribe Ivermectin under this government-independent scheme. Pharmacies don't have to fear fines and penalties for filling a scrip for Ivermectin. Healtcare is a fundamental human right and I don't see a problem with 2 parallel ones existing: one Allopathic/Rockerfeller which is the current Medicare and the other homeopathic under Friendly Societies.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

You might not but the powers that be won't allow such a thing.

[–] 0 pt

I don't mind, because then I would refuse to pay into a system I'm banned from.

[–] 0 pt

If they decide to not provide healthcare for people who choose not to take the jab, then they would (if it were a logical approach) also have to deny health care to drug addicts, obese people, smokers, alcoholics, people who are injured while participating in risky activities (such as sports, motor sports, or illegal acts), etc.

Society has for a long time held that you cannot withhold treatment because of the prior actions of the patient, or whatever risks they have taken. A move in this direction is not a slippery slope, it's a fucking cliff.

[+] [deleted] 1 pt