Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

794

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

How come he wasn't considered the king if he was married to the queen?

[–] • 0 pt

Because he's not English but a deposed Dane that fled to Greece, hence people referring to him as Phil the Wog. He is Queen Consort and Duke of the realm.

Elizabeth II is not even a Windsor, that is the title from her uncle who abdicated the throne for an American divorcee, Wallis Simpson. Hence her father George VI (Albert Frederick Arthur George 'Saxe-Coburg and Gotha ;' then 'Windsor' Duek of York (Windsor from his older brothers title), took the throne until his early death.

All siblings have their surname as Mountbatten-Windsor except Charles as he heir apparent.

e.g. Earl of Wessex, the Queens youngest is really called Edward Antony Richard Louis Mountbatten-Windsor

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Elizabeth was heir, not Philip. She became Queen on George VI's death. She had no brother (who would have inherited the throne, had he existed.)

[–] • 0 pt

Let's start the Republican debate after Liz passes, out of respect. With absolutely anyone leading the Republican debate other than that clown Peter Fitzsimons. But these days there are too many Jews in the Australian parliament to make a difference if we secede from Great Britain and the commonwealth of nations. The Australian parliament is inadequate at representing Australia and Australian national interests and aspirations.