WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Yes, massive cognitive dissonance all around like:

  • We cannot support a higher population with current infrastructure so let's import migrants to create said cheap infrastructure, thusly creating a deficiency in housing.

  • An aging population and declining pregnancy rates mean we need more people, lets not incentivize births but rather import more third-world migrants, further displacing the people that built this nation.

  • Wages have stagnated so if we import more third-world migrants competing for the local job market we can continue stalling wages and career opportunities for our children and complain about a continued depression.

You get the picture.

In fact the ruling Conservatives led by Morrison explicitly state that Australia's current economic model relies on 200k migrants

Yes and under the coalition they blanket the media coverage (because they own all the media now) of illegals coming here and all the others flooding legally. Which only pails in comparison to Labors plan on 'Big Australia.' To push the 25M population to 35M, 50M, or even double that by 2050. So 1:2 or greater first-generation foreigners not born here would be instant societal collapse.

So we have the option to choose mass migration and gradual population replacement (White genocide) or excessive migration and eminent cultural and racial extinction.

But all the normies keep voting for two-party preferred because they are sheeple and act accordingly to last week's half-assed opinion based, tax funded broadcast on how to act, behave, and vote.