Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

532

The Covid synthetic gene therapy injections employ synthetic, thermostable nucleotide sequences which are wrapped in a PEG (polyethylene glycol)-lipid nanoparticles to protect from destruction in the bloodstream and facilitate entry into the cells. The claim is that the cellular machinery will engage with these synthetic sequences and produce segments which code for the SarsCov2 S1 spike protein. It is believed that the immune system will mount a sufficient antibody response.

Dr David Martin, emphasized that this technology does not meet the definition of a traditional vaccine as per the manufacturers’ claims. The trials do not test for reduction in transmission. These therapies do not prevent infection, merely reduction in one or more symptoms.

https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

**The Covid synthetic gene therapy injections employ synthetic, thermostable nucleotide sequences which are wrapped in a PEG (polyethylene glycol)-lipid nanoparticles to protect from destruction in the bloodstream and facilitate entry into the cells. The claim is that the cellular machinery will engage with these synthetic sequences and produce segments which code for the SarsCov2 S1 spike protein. It is believed that the immune system will mount a sufficient antibody response.** **Dr David Martin, emphasized that this technology does not meet the definition of a traditional vaccine as per the manufacturers’ claims. The trials do not test for reduction in transmission. These therapies do not prevent infection, merely reduction in one or more symptoms.** https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (3).
[–] • 1 pt

Dr. David Martin, emphasized that this technology does not meet the definition of a traditional vaccine as per the manufacturers’ claims.

Exactly, that's why I keep saying I'm completely fine with traditional vaccines and immunisation strategy which has reduced infant mortality the world over. Anti-vaxers are retards, but being Covid-19 "vaccine" hesitant is a healthy view to have.

Proper, safe, regulated vaccines can be:

  • Live-attenuated vaccines (small amounts of the virus) to treat: MMR and Yellow Fever
  • Inactivated vaccines (incomplete puzzle of the virus) to treat: Hep A, polio, Rabies, and Influenza
  • Subunit, recombinant, polysaccharide, and conjugate vaccines (specific protein, sugar, or capsid (a casing around the germ) to treat: Hep B, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, etc
  • Toxoid vaccines (germ toxin) to stimulate an immune response to treat: Diphtheria and Tetanus types.

Currently, we have the option of mRNA Pfizer vaccine which I believe to be recombinant, it will probably be inert today but will likely be a catalyst for something later on down the line. Or AstraZeneca chimp vaccine with 54.9% to 82.4% depending on the timeframe of booster shots and it won't protect you against South African or future strains. Then you have overseas vaccines like the Johnson and Johnson's vaccine which is straight-up DNA-based gene manipulation like some Jew eugenics program.

We also don't know if the mRNA coding to generate proteins will trigger an auto-immune response. Actually, we do know it can trigger an AIDS-like response as was prevalent in the Australian trials in rushing for a vaccine.

Worth archiving it u/Ex-Redditor before the handlers block the site.

Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis