WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

689

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

You were a travel agent and you suddenly can't map out a flight plan that would go around the hypothetically round planet?

Do you understand that flying 18 hours east makes it faster to get back to where you started by continuing to travel east instead of turning around? That doesnt bother you at all?

[–] -1 pt

Oh, you think being obtuse is a valid debating style.

There are ZERO commercial flight paths over the arctic or Antarctica. Maybe you tried to find one, but instead of being honest and saying you couldn’t find one, your reptile brain decided to try and gaslight me. Yeah, nah.

Do you understand what ‘flying east’ means? It means you are flying at a right angle to north. North being the magnetic North Pole. Again, this is true on BOTH models.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Who said anything about about flying north and south?

Why is it that you keep changing the target?

[–] -1 pt

I’m not.

I think you may have sub-par comprehension. Or simply too arrogant to think someone is impervious to your (blatant) manipulation and gaslighting!

It went like this:

YOU SAID I’ve checked flight path durations on a globe and it adds up.

I SAID some aspects work on both models. I countered your (shallow) assumption by asking you how many of those flight paths you ‘researched’ went over the north or south poles.

YOU ignored my question and proceeded to attempt gaslighting me into ‘believing’ that I had not followed the conversation. Lame effort. Seriously like very amateur attempt lol