WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The shuttle goes straight up the arch is the rotation of the earth. But that is what I was told. I love God and knowledge and they must coexist or one is not true

[–] 1 pt

They launch something once a week here and this town wouldn't exist without the Space Center. But I know that the more I learn the less I know.

[–] -1 pt

I also feel like that... and would add that the more I learn, the more I realise the depth and breadth of the deception.

NASA’s budget is astronomical (pun intended) - if they weren’t launching regularly they might not keep being able to justify increasing their budget each and every year.

Imagine how enraged you would become if you determined absolutely that NASA was pissing that money down the drain, not to ACTUALLY ‘explore space’, but rather to convince us that they were. I was very fucking enraged. Considering how poorly veterans are treated, and how much of a difference life would be for the average American if the billions (or quadrillions over just the past decade) of nasa bucks were diverted to health!!

[–] 0 pt

Understood 2 million for a tolite on the Space Shuttle was retarded but now Elon Musk is doing it at less than a 3rd of what NASA was and Space X has achieved more in a few years than NASA did in decades the government has many ways of hiding spending. No one talks about the trillions of dollars the Pentagon lost the day before 9/11 and the office that was investigating the lost money was where the (plane) hit the Pentagon

[–] -1 pt

I don’t pretend to have all the answers, and I also acknowledge that some aspects work on both models.

One thing I would ask you to consider doing, is to look at the moon on a cloudy night. See how the moonlight illuminates ONLY the clouds very close to it, marry that with the knowledge (can be tested yourself with a torch against a wall) that a light source FAR from an object would have a very broad beam, but when the torch is close to the wall (or object) the beam is only slightly larger than the light source. If the moon is 240k miles from earth, it should illuminate all the clouds you can see in your vision.

It does not do this, because it (and the sun) are local lights. The sun is NOT 93 MILLION miles away!

Just some food for thought :-)