![Oh look, the sun’s movement around the earth [750x1334 - 1.21MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/OZWKTc.png){kind=link}
Oh, you think being obtuse is a valid debating style.
There are ZERO commercial flight paths over the arctic or Antarctica. Maybe you tried to find one, but instead of being honest and saying you couldn’t find one, your reptile brain decided to try and gaslight me. Yeah, nah.
Do you understand what ‘flying east’ means? It means you are flying at a right angle to north. North being the magnetic North Pole. Again, this is true on BOTH models.
Who said anything about about flying north and south?
Why is it that you keep changing the target?
I’m not.
I think you may have sub-par comprehension. Or simply too arrogant to think someone is impervious to your (blatant) manipulation and gaslighting!
It went like this:
YOU SAID I’ve checked flight path durations on a globe and it adds up.
I SAID some aspects work on both models. I countered your (shallow) assumption by asking you how many of those flight paths you ‘researched’ went over the north or south poles.
YOU ignored my question and proceeded to attempt gaslighting me into ‘believing’ that I had not followed the conversation. Lame effort. Seriously like very amateur attempt lol
Let me cut this up and feed it to you in smaller chunks.
In this example:
https://www.onlytoptens.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/top-10-retro-games-pacman.jpg
The pink ghost can get to the right hand side in 1 second if he goes left.
Or
The pink ghost can get to the same destination by going right , but it will take 6 seconds (or 5 if there was a direct path.)
Does it not bother you that the duration of flights demonstrate the same truth?
They match up in a way that it reaches a point that it is faster to just keep flying around the panet.
Said another way. There exists no flat earth map that works with the fligh times
(post is archived)