Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

234

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

If you really think this could happen with an earth spinning and going around a sun that is also moving around a galaxy, well, you aren’t thinking, you are regurgitating what you have been told to think.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (217).
[–] • 1 pt

I analyzed flights over the globe and found them consistent with the duration of time it would take. A compass works on an airplane.

Why not pool some dollars together and buy 2 or 3 plane tickets to observe with a compass anomolies and record it into their flight log?

Is there interest in actaully conducting an experiment that would contradict their beliefs?

[–] • 0 pt

If you bring a construction level onto an airplane then at cruising altitude it stays completely level... how that work on a globe?

I fully support anyone conducting their own tests and experiments, as I have, which is why I’m secure in my opinion.

Like with vaccines, once you know how ineffective and unsafe they are (and therefore worse than useless) you can’t UN-know that.

[–] • 1 pt

Who said anything about a construction level?

[–] • -1 pt

I did.

I assumed you knew what they were - the little air bubble tells you whether something is parallel to the earth. Mmmmkay?

[–] • 0 pt

Also, I’ve been on a number of flights since I first began looking into the shape of the earth with an open mind. And my videos show a flat land. And invariably the planes ascend, remain level and then descend. Which makes perfect sense on a flat earth, and no sense on a globe.

There are definitely aspects that work on BOTH models.

But it’s flat. “Like a seal on wax” is roughly how the bible puts it.

[–] • 1 pt

Who said anything about a video?

I think you misunderstand.

If you plot a path to fly around the globe (through buenos aires, for example) then the duration of flight and times match up to how long it would take and cannot make sense on a flat earth.

You dont even need to buy thr tickets. Just go on orbitz and punch in any 2 destinations

[–] • -1 pt

I was a travel agent many years ago. How many flight paths did you find that go OVER the arctic circle or Antarctica?

Why do you think flight times prove anything is a far more interesting question.

Like I said in a previous reply to someone, there are aspects which work on both flat and ball models, however there is no curvature, so there is no ball.

Let me know once you have proof of curvature lol

The Verrazano Narrows bridge is a hilarious example of ‘accounting for curvature’ which highlights the level water under the bridge.