What do we know: official story doesn't add up
My take: Paddock was a cia or fbi asset setting up a gun deal that went south. He was either killed by whoever he rented the second room for or sacrificed by the agency he worked for so the event could be written off as a the work of a lone wolf nutter.
What are your feelings on the saudis and the prince that was there at the hotel?
you mean the theory that some weaponized drones were being tested out on the crowd in a sales demonstration for to the Saudi's or other foreign gov't as a way to handle unruly crowds? that's way out there but, in a sick way, plausible
or the theory that some Saudi faction was trying to take out the prince so they could re-take he throne? eh - maybe
lots of theories and I haven't been following those in a bit since, really, its all speculation. but it seems obvious, with him renting a second adjacent suite, and with 2 windows broken out, that he was no lone wolf. that one fact breaks the narrative.
I was thinking more along the lines of killing the prince, or possibly something related to the issues going on with the Sauds. I haven't heard anything about drones.
(post is archived)