I don't think Greenland as melted, but my bathwater does feel warmer...

Chicken?

This is clearly a question for chef dong!

CO2 emmisions lag global temps. When the global temps change THEN the CO2 changes, not the other way around as they'd like you to believe.

There is no connection between CO2 PPM density in atmophere and global temp changes.

CO2 is essential for life itself to exist. Greenhouses pump in 80% CO2 to their plants so they grow bigger. But, apparently, CO2 is satan.

They freak out about "greenhouse gases". But they fail to mention that water is THE MOST ABUNDANT GREENHoUSE GAS in our atmosphere. Gotta get rid of water if we really want to get rid of greenhouse gases.

Sun spots denote solar activity. The higher the sun spot count, the "hotter" the sun is acting. Sun spots have been used for centuries to accurately predict the direction of global climate patterns. Sun spots are a more accurate predictor of global climate shifts than any other metric that I'm aware of.

Al Gore has at least 1 more house than you. His smallest house is bigger than your largest.

Al Gore has to take his private jet to go to a climate conference where he tells you to ride your bike more.

I've know mountaineering guides irl who say they have personally observed glaciers shrinking over the years, so I believe it's getting warmer, for whatever reason. I still think the CO2 part is bullshit, though.

Heres what we know:

The establishment started spreading FUD about global cooling in the 70 and 80s. We know it was FUD because the earth hasn't frozen over.

Then in the 90s the establishment started spreading FUD about global warming. We know it's FUD because the earth hasn't flooded or burned.

Some people have latched onto the "no, it's global cooling that real They got it right the first time!" FUD. We also know that a common tactic in propaganda is to spread two competing ideas that are false or controlled narratives in order to push a third, desired outcome (action, reaction, synthesis).

We also know that weather modification has been going on for decades, and despite all the denials and active state-funded propaganda efforts online, there has been credible officials and whisteblowers who have admitted to ongoing geoengineer projects, the scope of which is undoubtedly much larger than is admitted.

Other things we know, that are only tangent to the discussion:

Small prey die offs are common of nuclear contamination.

Bees are, in a very real sense, going extinct, and insect populations are all but in free fall.

Likewise birds.

These things we know. But what else do we know?

Organs of the state have been spreading FUD about 'pole reversals' and claiming 'cosmic rays will be much more common, reaching the ground and increasing cancer rates.'

But we know this isn't true, because a 'pole reversal' will take centuries minimum. So the radiation has to come from somewhere.

Whats currently leaking massive amounts of radiation into the oceans and atmosphere?

Why are there numerous reports of species die offs in the ocean, and things like seals covered in lesions?

Why are there numerous citizen-sourced reports of increased background radiation that the news media isn't reporting on?

In short: Why have we heard nothing about Fukushima lately?