Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

793

these 2 think they can (despite it not being the case):

-prevent users downvoting each other as the involved users see fit

-prevent users from going after people in their boys club

-prevent users from questioning how poal ticks

users in fact do as they please, and when these 2 meddle and pry and force things onto accounts they dont like, that just makes any resistance they were trying to crush stronger

have these 2 considered not being meddlesome glowniggers?

these 2 think they can (despite it not being the case): -prevent users downvoting each other as the involved users see fit -prevent users from going after people in their boys club -prevent users from questioning how poal ticks users in fact do as they please, and when these 2 meddle and pry and force things onto accounts they dont like, that just makes any resistance they were trying to crush stronger have these 2 considered not being meddlesome glowniggers?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (38).
[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

What a brave man, fighting for his right to arbitrarily influence meaningless points on an online forum.

[–] • -2 pt

if its so meaningless to poal staff, explain the "safety measure" existing

voting is speech. poal doesn't think you should say "no" too often. that is suspicious

[–] • 4 pts

If shitting was speech would you respect the opinions of fat people more?

[–] • -1 pt

fat people are disgusting, let's not use them for moral heroes.

[–] • 4 pts

Can I come to your house and shit on your rug? It's my free speech after all, you're a bigot if you say no.

Also, been drinking this weekend so it's gonna be squishy one. I hope you like peanuts!