WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

If the outcome is the same, the person dying, wouldn't smashing someone with an anti-material rifle have a smaller chance of civilian casualties than a grenade or bomb?

If the outcome is the same, the person dying, wouldn't smashing someone with an anti-material rifle have a smaller chance of civilian casualties than a grenade or bomb?

(post is archived)

Because the world doesn't really make any sense, when you start thinking about it.

Come to think about it, that's probably why we're always told not to think about it.

You know what I think? I think that somebody better think of something, and fast.