So our conspiracy would be to sow a conspiracy theory.
I guess that's anti-conspiracy theorists takes is that likely the theory if wrong is likely being pushed by some group. But ironically if it were the case it would prove that conspiracies happen. That or they just don't like the accuracy of the information because they are a part of or connected to the conspiracy being targeted.
So our conspiracy would be to sow a conspiracy theory.
I guess that's anti-conspiracy theorists takes is that likely the theory if wrong is likely being pushed by some group. But ironically if it were the case it would prove that conspiracies happen. That or they just don't like the accuracy of the information because they are a part of or connected to the conspiracy being targeted.
Isn't this a shill tactic called consensus cracking or something like that? Making a weak argument against a position you don't agree with so that the position you actually favor will seem logical and may even be taken up by your target?
Isn't this a shill tactic called consensus cracking or something like that? Making a weak argument against a position you don't agree with so that the position you actually favor will seem logical and may even be taken up by your target?
(post is archived)