Isn't this a shill tactic called consensus cracking or something like that? Making a weak argument against a position you don't agree with so that the position you actually favor will seem logical and may even be taken up by your target?
Isn't this a shill tactic called consensus cracking or something like that? Making a weak argument against a position you don't agree with so that the position you actually favor will seem logical and may even be taken up by your target?
(post is archived)