WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

116

It feels like I haven't had a respectful discussion of differing ideas in... 10 years?

And half the time, political discussions aren't about the merit of the ideas being discussed, they always end up being about how much one party or another is too disdainful to even listen to.

And to be clear, I do occasionally find myself guilty of this.

It feels like I haven't had a respectful discussion of differing ideas in... 10 years? And half the time, political discussions aren't about the merit of the ideas being discussed, they always end up being about how much one party or another is too disdainful to even listen to. And to be clear, I do occasionally find myself guilty of this.
[–] 5 pts

Mockery comes when someone without facts is actually facing facts.

[–] 1 pt

Or when engaging someone who refuses to work on a civil, factual level. Appropriate tool for the job.

[–] 0 pt

Mockery comes when someone without facts is actually facing facts.

Have you ever engaged in mockery?

[–] 3 pts

Your post title contains a clue to the very problem you are asking about. Your title used the word "feel" in it. Much like most discourse in the modern day, everything is about how something "feels" rather than what one thinks about the topic. The jews have subverted our very methods of discussing things by transforming our discourse into an emotional contest instead of a cerebral challenge. Feelings have their place, but they are not intended to be the center of everything that needs to be discussed or debated. We need thinkers at the present as we have an overabundance of bleeding heart "feelers". The jews love to manipulate language and this is just another one of their tricks.

Think about this the next time the word "feel" comes out of you mouth. It might just cause you to see the trap and avoid it altogether.

[–] 2 pts

oh no, i used a word didn't approve!

[–] 4 pts

oh no, i used a word didn't approve!

and discourse degrades to mockery...

[–] 2 pts

You are absolutely right, I just felt like you were trying to edit my words, and I didn't like that, because it hurt my feelings.

[–] 0 pt

Discussion of feelings is for faggots and women. Men discuss difficult points that have concrete concepts. Not feelings.

If I asked you to analyze a poem I post you won’t tell me how you fell about it or how it makes you feel. You will dissect it for its form, function, prose, style and if it follows the Rules set forth by the composition of the type of poem it follows.

Take that and apply it to conversations.

Feelings aren’t what people debate.

[–] 2 pts

I immediately wanted to mock you in some way, proving your point in a funny way, but lately, I just immediately lose the urge to do so right after thinking the thought. Maybe next time.

[–] 1 pt

I think it's a real problem in modern political discourse. Each side is just looking for a gotcha moment. I too am guilty of indulging.

[–] 1 pt

The jews, mega rich, and other powers that be don't have any interest in the people having discussions, because anyone with intelligence then sees most issues are largely presented in merely different flavors of uniparty bullshit. But if they can get people emotional it keeps them way from facts and away from recognizing that the jews and mega rich are a serious problem.

[–] 1 pt

You mean since when Obama took over, told everyone in the media learn to code and then funded the violence with AntiFa, BLM, and LaRaza against straight whites just as they stopped being prejudiced against all other races?

[–] 1 pt

We raised three generations on sitcoms where everybody always has to get a zinger in; monkey see, monkey do.

[–] 1 pt

Specifically political ideas? If so yes, I could more easily speak/argue with leftoids 10 years ago. It became harder around 2015-ish. I mostly blame them for it, woke leftism was starting to peak and they started to be emotionally triggered by everything against their world view. Besides it gets on the nerve eventually facing the uncivilized antifa fags whenever pro-White people try to do something good, not easy to talk with such people. Also stakes are higher now because of all the damage they've made to our countries.

[–] 0 pt

When you ask questions like “how so” the engagement we’ll always be minimal. You are capable of challenging sentences, but too often don’t use them. That lack of engagement is like a shrink. People don’t like that.

[–] 1 pt

When you ask questions like “how so” the engagement we’ll always be minimal.

Can you make a post that gets better engagement, so I can see how it is done?

[–] 0 pt

No.

[–] 1 pt

ok, why should I ever take your advice then?