Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

356

The way trials work is you will, in 99.9% of cases, never know it's a copyright trial until partly through voir dare (jury selection). So you'd already be in the potential juror pool. The assumption is the plaintiff (the person whose copyright was 'stolen') is the giant corporation.

good answers

Funny, thought provoking, honest, blah blah blah. I don't really care very much other than more than I'm bored.

The way trials work is you will, in 99.9% of cases, never know it's a copyright trial until partly through voir dare (jury selection). So you'd already be in the potential juror pool. The assumption is the plaintiff (the person whose copyright was 'stolen') is the giant corporation. >good answers Funny, thought provoking, honest, blah blah blah. I don't really care very much other than more than I'm bored.
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 1 pt

The vidya game industry suffers a similar fate in the court room very very very often. The idea of "pokemon" was straight ripoff of dragon quest (IIRC). Where's the crushing blow to pokemon? Money prevents that and the like in other situations. There's a lot of content written about this phenomena.

[–] • 3 pts

Wow til about dragon quest. The irony now that Nintendo have patented the idea of Pokeballs and took/threatened to take the creators of palworld to court for using monster capturing device

[–] • 2 pts

It's absolutely insane. Every glance at reality, at a timeline etc. proves palworld was first.