WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

Nuclear isn't cheaper, cleaner, more sustainable or even more efficient than other methods of producing electricity. Why would anyone want to switch to it since the jewish lies about (((climate change))) and (((peak oil))) and the like are often used as reasons for eliminating most current energy production. Just like with the push for (((EVs))), the reasons fail when the jewish lies are taken out of the equation. Nuclear doesn't seem to offer any real non-jew related benefits. Do people support it just like it because it's cool and techy?

Nuclear isn't cheaper, cleaner, more sustainable or even more efficient than other methods of producing electricity. Why would anyone want to switch to it since the jewish lies about (((climate change))) and (((peak oil))) and the like are often used as reasons for eliminating most current energy production. Just like with the push for (((EVs))), the reasons fail when the jewish lies are taken out of the equation. Nuclear doesn't seem to offer any real non-jew related benefits. Do people support it just like it because it's cool and techy?
[–] 1 pt

Thorium has issues with the cooling medium, the liquid salts. They corrode faster than a fat dude can hit the buffet at golden corral. They've come a long way in fixing it, but it's still not great. I think they said the piping needs to be replaced every 5 years. That's a significant cost.

But in theory, yes, Thorium is great stuff.