Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

422

What are your thoughts on monarchy? I know most of us are NatSoc, yet I find that NatSoc seems more of a stepping stone back to and foundation of a Monarchy. A Monarchy cannot be stable without at least some of the core tenants of National Socialism. A love of one's nation and the desire to see it healthy and Prosper being the most important.

Not just the feasibility of a Monarchy, but what are your thoughts on if a Monarchy is even necessary or what a Monarchy actually entails beyond a "King." Is a Monarchy more stable and resistant to corruption as it's easier to see the head of the beast should it become diseased? Is the hierarchy of a Monarchy more conducive to a happy and flourishing population with less societal ills plaguing them?

What are the faults of a Monarchy? What are the boons of a Monarchy? What can be done to make a better system?

Do note that I do not believe that there is a politician alive today that I would trust with the powers and mantle of a King. But I do think that having a stable leader would be better than this 4-8 year thing we have in America where things can change on a dime (And usually only for the worse) depending on who is in power at the time. It's just not something I see discussed often, because for some reason people think "Democracy" is the be all end all of politics.

What are your thoughts on monarchy? I know most of us are NatSoc, yet I find that NatSoc seems more of a stepping stone back to and foundation of a Monarchy. A Monarchy cannot be stable without at least some of the core tenants of National Socialism. A love of one's nation and the desire to see it healthy and Prosper being the most important. Not just the feasibility of a Monarchy, but what are your thoughts on if a Monarchy is even necessary or what a Monarchy actually entails beyond a "King." Is a Monarchy more stable and resistant to corruption as it's easier to see the head of the beast should it become diseased? Is the hierarchy of a Monarchy more conducive to a happy and flourishing population with less societal ills plaguing them? What are the faults of a Monarchy? What are the boons of a Monarchy? What can be done to make a better system? Do note that I do not believe that there is a politician alive today that I would trust with the powers and mantle of a King. But I do think that having a stable leader would be better than this 4-8 year thing we have in America where things can change on a dime (And usually only for the worse) depending on who is in power at the time. It's just not something I see discussed often, because for some reason people think "Democracy" is the be all end all of politics.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 1 pt

You really are adverse to answering my questions. I'm working on a post in another tab to your post, but why must I prove anything when I am not asking for proof or stating any concrete ideas, just general ideas and discussion? Opening a Dialogue, not demanding anything. I didn't say "It would work 100%" or anything of the sorts.

You seem very quick to shut down this topic and refuse to elaborate on why YOU think it will not work or talk about the actual problems with the system of governance, just demand proof that it will work in a "Post-Industrial" world when asked why you think it wouldn't.

Again, I wasn't saying 100% that Monarchy would work out or that it was the better government between it and NatSoc. Just opening a discussion on the topic to gather viewpoints, ideas for and against, how to make it work and so on. That's the point of a discussion. I wasn't even setting out to prove anything.

I'm no statesman, and I make no claims to be. I'm just tired of fake and gay Democracy.