WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

806

What are your thoughts on monarchy? I know most of us are NatSoc, yet I find that NatSoc seems more of a stepping stone back to and foundation of a Monarchy. A Monarchy cannot be stable without at least some of the core tenants of National Socialism. A love of one's nation and the desire to see it healthy and Prosper being the most important.

Not just the feasibility of a Monarchy, but what are your thoughts on if a Monarchy is even necessary or what a Monarchy actually entails beyond a "King." Is a Monarchy more stable and resistant to corruption as it's easier to see the head of the beast should it become diseased? Is the hierarchy of a Monarchy more conducive to a happy and flourishing population with less societal ills plaguing them?

What are the faults of a Monarchy? What are the boons of a Monarchy? What can be done to make a better system?

Do note that I do not believe that there is a politician alive today that I would trust with the powers and mantle of a King. But I do think that having a stable leader would be better than this 4-8 year thing we have in America where things can change on a dime (And usually only for the worse) depending on who is in power at the time. It's just not something I see discussed often, because for some reason people think "Democracy" is the be all end all of politics.

What are your thoughts on monarchy? I know most of us are NatSoc, yet I find that NatSoc seems more of a stepping stone back to and foundation of a Monarchy. A Monarchy cannot be stable without at least some of the core tenants of National Socialism. A love of one's nation and the desire to see it healthy and Prosper being the most important. Not just the feasibility of a Monarchy, but what are your thoughts on if a Monarchy is even necessary or what a Monarchy actually entails beyond a "King." Is a Monarchy more stable and resistant to corruption as it's easier to see the head of the beast should it become diseased? Is the hierarchy of a Monarchy more conducive to a happy and flourishing population with less societal ills plaguing them? What are the faults of a Monarchy? What are the boons of a Monarchy? What can be done to make a better system? Do note that I do not believe that there is a politician alive today that I would trust with the powers and mantle of a King. But I do think that having a stable leader would be better than this 4-8 year thing we have in America where things can change on a dime (And usually only for the worse) depending on who is in power at the time. It's just not something I see discussed often, because for some reason people think "Democracy" is the be all end all of politics.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Monarchy implies heredity. Look at the history of the British crown and how that worked out. Hunter Biden would be next in line from old Joe...nah.

[–] 0 pt

NatSoc kinda realized you needed support of the people, however. How does a Monarchy work with an educated populace in a post-industrial world?

[–] 0 pt

The real question to ask yourself is: "How doesn't it."

And I don't see any real reason it wouldn't work out. Monarchies don't require the people to be stupid. Monarchies do not require in any way shape or form pre-industrial standards of living.

I'm seriously asking what you think would preclude Monarchies from working in a post-industrial world.

[–] 0 pt

Burden of proof always goes to the individual posing the idea. @Morbo

[–] 0 pt

I'm not asking you for proof of anything, I'm asking you what YOUR thoughts on what precludes Monarchy from working in a Post-Industrial world because you brought up that as a reason why it might not work.

[–] 0 pt

Monarchy is a great system with no foreseen pitfalls but only if I were king.