WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

249

Looking for suggestions from the unwashed.

Looking for suggestions from the unwashed.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

In general, the bang or presence of a gun is more important than the caliber. If she does have to fire, a 22 or 25 will have low recoil that will make follow up shots much easier, depending on her size. A 100 pound woman would have issues with followup shots, even with something mellow like a 380. I'm addition, a bobcat can be hidden literally anywhere. Women clothing and such may or may not permit a larger weapon without printing

[–] 0 pt

If she does have to fire, a 22 or 25 will have low recoil that will make follow up shots much easier

The premise is flawed, and why I recommend everyone take some self-defense classes. Inside of 20', being able to draw and get off a shot at all is difficult, much less the precision required for .22 or .25 where it's facial triangle or the crime blotter. "Follow-up shots" are how gun manufacturers sell comically underpowered varmint rounds to women who're big hecking scared of handguns.

If you want an easy way to test this without springimg for a non-lethal training handgun, go get a laser pointer and a banana. Tell your buddy to rush you sometime that day and try to "stab" you with a banana before you can draw and laser pointer him in the face. After you get banana'd to death half a dozen times, you'll stop screwing around with squirrel rounds and get a caliber where even a poorly aimed JHP to the spleen will put an assailant down.

[–] 1 pt

self defense classes

Classes and training aren't possible if she's afraid to fire the weapon, or can't handle it comfortably.

Again: my first choice for a woman is something in 380. But I think you're too quick to discount 22/25/32. If it's what works for someone, it's better than trying to fight them off with your bare hands. And if you can comfortably shoot off a few hundred rounds at the range of 22, as opposed to 50 rounds of something larger, guess which weapon they will be more proficient with when shit goes down

[–] 1 pt

Don't take this personally but the original Bodyguard .380 is a terrible choice for a new female shooter. It sucks to shoot because it hurts to shoot. Most women will not want to shoot it again and it'll be a wasted investment.

Supposedly the Bodyguard 2.0 is much more comfortable to shoot but I cannot confirm that myself.

Having gone through the process of introducing firearms to a young woman that previously never wanted to touch a firearm, I had her start with a .22 for familiarization but then stepped her up to the S&W Shield EZ .380. She ended up buying a Shield EZ .380 for herself.