when I was young I was convinced I needed a well paying career to survive because I cant expect my husband to make enough to support a family so I took my schooling very seriously.
I went to a tradeschool mainly because it was free, and partially because I didnt want a desk job where I would likely get fat. Funny because I was depressed and stressed out enough to make me think drinking lots of beer was a great idea so I got fat anyways. I lived by myself for most of tradeschool, 400$ rent for a room in my dad's house while he would be gone for years on a job out of state. So it was like I had the whole house to myself. Sorority of one dumbass.
Alot of my potential was squandered because I cared too much in all the wrong ways. Wish I was redpilled much sooner.
It continually strikes me as strange that feminists convince young women that their prospective husbands wont be able to support a household. The fact that any of us are around proves that men were able to do that, and that women are supremely skilled at picking those men so their babies dont starve.
Yet feminists try to convince women that men and women became absolutely retarded at those core skills 50-60 years ago for no reason and that women need to get a job to compensate.
It's like if Apple started marketing robot dogs because "real dogs all magically forgot how to bark at burglars last week". Pretty sure they didnt...
(post is archived)