Bright insight does a good job selling the richat structure as Atlantis. That being said his whole argument revolves around "looks like". Looks like isn't a really solid metric to make claims on. Then he covers up the total lack of real evidence, by blaming the powers that be. Academia and governments are a good scapegoat for sure, but unfortunately it doesn't even remotely come close proving anything.
If there was an advanced civilization in that part of Africa, there would be a lot of evidence. The only thing they talk about finding there is salt, which is interesting but it only reinforces the "looks like" argument for that being Atlantis.
There is a better argument that some rich Mediterranean island with plumbing and advanced architecture that was built on an active volcano is what plato was talking about.
Mud flood, the evidence is buried, nobody has dug as much as a shovel full of dirt in that area
If the rings aren't buried in mud, then there would be evidence on top of the rings, that's where the city was supposedly at, on top of the rings with water in the middle right? It's shame no one's looked. Seems like if a huge ancient civilization was there, it would be pretty easy to find evidence of.
He's done some pretty good follow up videos finding old maps and other references to it as well.
He also says that no-one has dug into it because dogs cost money and Mauritania is full of niggers so people that try to dig there will likely be killed or have their shit stolen or both.
Also he was talking about measurements and how they are pretty spot on as well, not just based off "looks like"
(post is archived)