Honestly i'm just shocked you bother fucking with me at all, if someone really doesnt like someone they just leave them alone. typical male response. You're welcome to comment on my posts and be an asinine dickhead with advice meant to be waste my time because you dont take me seriously, thats just fine, just dont expect me to offer you more than simple woman logic responses and downvotes. You know I'm a simple dumbass woman yet here you are wasting your time with me, doesnt make a lick of sense.
Honestly i'm just shocked you bother fucking with me at all, if someone really doesnt like someone they just leave them alone.
Lol! Don't flatter yourself. I answered your post because of the topic. It was not an attack nor was I fucking with you. You didn't even reply to me on my original comment and instead inserted yourself into a discussion I was having with another user. You went out of your way to go attack me in another part of the thread that didn't include you. The tables are turned...
You're welcome to comment on my posts and be an asinine dickhead with advice meant to be waste my time because you dont take me seriously, thats just fine, just dont expect me to offer you more than simple woman logic responses and downvotes.
Go back to my original comment and tell us all how that was me being a dickhead. If I didn't take you serious, I would ignore you entirely as I do with some others on this site whom I do not take serious.
You know I'm a simple dumbass woman yet here you are wasting your time with me, doesnt make a lick of sense.
I ignored your sex when I first commented on your post. I gave a mathematical/scientific answer that was free of sex/gender. Way to go making it about sex/gender when there was no reason to. That doesn't make a lick of sense...
theres lots of different reasons to not like someone from either gender if someone is unlikable or not, im sure theres plenty of male scrubs you dont like on here too. Honestly this comment here just sounded like you werent taking any of this thread seriously and you were just messing with me pretending to give usefull advice in your first comment. Not necisarily because of my gender, but because you dont like me as a whole. Im sure theres females out there you like and respect, i just doubt i'm one of them
OP is assuming the same thing. I'm making it uniform to prove a point. That point is the larger the area, the lower the concentration. There was not enough material released to warrant a 300-mile radius fear as OP implied. Also, the materials burned which changed them chemically and made other compounds. Much of the new compounds were not hazardous (CO2 and water and such). The hypothetical scenario needs only answered by a hypothetical answer. I did that to show the absurdity of being overly fearful here.
The hypothetical scenario needs only answered by a hypothetical answer.
dude what the fuck is that supposed to mean, non of this is hypothetical
ude what the fuck is that supposed to mean, non of this is hypothetical
It's hypothetical when the question does not provide specific details, data or constraints to do real mathematical/scientific work on. Hypothetical means "based primarily on surmise rather than adequate evidence". I think that fits my response to a T.
(post is archived)