Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

447

C sections are necessary sometimes but the c section rate here shouldn't be that high. The numbers suggest it's a kike scam to discourage women from having more kids. What do you think?

C sections are necessary sometimes but the c section rate here shouldn't be that high. The numbers suggest it's a kike scam to discourage women from having more kids. What do you think?

(post is archived)

[–] • 14 pts

I delivered one of my children in my shower just me and my wife. It was so awesome and natural. They've scared everyone with bullshit. Technology now can see issues from a mile away to know if you're really a high risk. If someone got a c section I'd bet they really didn't need to. Also they have some preconceived notion that 38 weeks is when you should have the baby and 40 weeks is late. 42 is late and even then it's only elevated concern, not emergency. Everyone is different and milage may vary, most people never really need to step foot in a hospital. I highly encourage home birth to anyone. Every. Single. Aspect. of homebirth is better than a jew hospital.

[–] • 11 pts

It's 100% anti-natal, but not in the way it presents itself. I believe it's a system of IQ/fertility/vitality retardation at the onset of White life.

I've never met or heard of a White woman avoiding having kids because of fear of c-section, the narrative is that it's a procedure of last resort. That said, the way the medical system sells c-sections to these White women is that it IS medically necessary otherwise you risk the baby and mother.

Just in the last year I know four normie women that all got them due to fear porn from the doctors, but there were no measurable medical conditions and the doctors just wanted to avoid liabilities. Another nefarious practice is "induction" of the baby, either for schedule convenience or due date obsession, but regardless it's anti-nature. Just look at all the things the doctors want to do to that baby as soon as it's out of the womb, it's horrific.

[–] • 5 pts

My mid wife says half her deliveries have the umbilical cord around the neck. That's probably the number one pressure tactic. The second pressure tactic is as I mentioned earlier, a false premise that past 38 weeks is only going to increase pain for mother. At 39 weeks they can start pressure to say hey we can help this along. They induce when it's not necessary and cause undue stress on the baby.

[–] • 3 pts

"This totally normal thing your people have dealt with for thousands of years is actually the reason why you need to do what I say so I can make your baby retarded, slice off his dick and extract wealth from you." -jews

Something quite disturbing I saw was during the most recent interview with Dana White by CIA jew lex friedman. Dana was talking about how much he works, and because of that he forced his wife to induce and deliver early because it conflicted with a UFC fight he scheduled - then laughs about it. This is the style of "pro-life" Trump and the neo-populists push that we must contend with.

[–] • 2 pts

Yea, that's a pretty common attitude around here. Many stories of women getting induced to make sure their doctor is there for the delivery.

They maximize unnecessary scare tactics and minimize scare tactics on pictocin. One of my wifes acquaintances just lost a baby after being induced. Doctor used to much, put the baby into stress. She delivered a dead baby. Doctor gave the baby a heart attack but blamed it on bullshit. That lady has zero to go after that doctor. He'll walk away and sleep fine after he inadvertently murdered that baby because the mother was taking too long to have the baby (she wasn't). If my midwife did that, she'd lose everything she has.

[–] • 2 pts

The jew rears it's tiny hat head.

[–] • 0 pt

Half?! WTF! I've never heard that statistic; but I'm not a midwife either.

[–] • 1 pt

It's purely anecdotal and not literal, the point being, it's a common occurrence and not the emergency it's made out to be. The 80 yr old lady has over 3000 births all over the world. She's seen her share and has demonstrated to me she knows what she's talking about. Just my experience.

[–] • 3 pts

I almost avoided having more kids because doctors said I'd always need to have repeat c sections for future pregnancies. The first one was bad enough, worst pain I ever felt and I almost died. I wanted a big family but it's not worth repeating that 'just in case' things go wrong. I'm so lucky that someone told me they lied about risks and that they can't legally force anyone to have surgery. If I didn't know any better and thought there was no way out of future surgeries half my kids wouldn't exist.

[–] • 1 pt

Rule no. 1 of the internet, everyone is a guy until pictures prove otherwise. You know your doctor was shit when he tried to convince a dude needed a c-section.

[–] • 1 pt

I agree, absolutely correct. And it pisses me off.

[–] • 9 pts

I do know that once a woman has a c-section birth, They have to do a c-section for every birth after. Theres no going back to vaginal birth. Also a c-section ruins the mother child bond, it is not beneficial to the childs health. A vaginal birth helps supply the baby with good intestinal flora and oxytocin for both mom and baby. C-sections remove the human aspect and it becomes mechanical. Mom and baby need oxytocin to bond. Its also pushed in the new mommy space. Its pushed as more healthy and safer and less pain. Its all BS. It's definitely a kike scam. They can charge more for the procedure, They can schedule it in advance and it continues to create new patients by way of the new infant. Its part of the normalization that we are flawed and need help. Its on par with infant genital mutilations (circumcision).

[–] • 9 pts

They hate me because I refuse repeat c sections lol. They lie about how risky VBAC is, it is possible and not even as risky as what they say it is. The rupture rate studies doctors like to bring up include cases where they used pitocin which can cause a rupture. They'll do VBAC around here for horizontal scar types (not everywhere, some hospitals have VBAC bans) but not for vertical like mine. Luckily I learned how to get around their 'rule' by just refusing to sign the consent form and signing an AMA/form that makes the doctors not cry about liability if stuff goes wrong. The doctors won't take me as a patient though because I won't sign a c section consent form the first time I meet them. I just have to show up at the hospital. That's fine with me though, they stress me out so much I'm better off avoiding them anyway.

Doctors are horrible but almost funny with how stupid their lies are. They know they can't force surgery on someone who knows their rights but they still try to convince me I'll die without it. Then I ask them what's the worst you've seen from a VBAC? Have you even seen a rupture? Only one doctor I talked to out of many, had seen a rupture and they noticed it after the baby was born and stitched the lady up. Death from it is so rare and they use that small risk as an excuse to demand women have surgery.

[–] • 3 pts

Obesity increases c-section rates. So does pervasive STDs in a notable demographic. So does working (western women can't get enough of muy career, which is inconvenienced by unpredictable delivery dates), and greatest of all is the fucktarded female fascination with hospitals. In the past, 10% of babies were delivered in hospitals. Now it's 90%. You know what happens when you go to a hospital full of surgeons? They recommend surgery. Sure, you'll probably be fine with delivering ye olde way, but surgeons are nervous about liability suits so they recommend the predictable option.

[–] • 3 pts

They are enormous cunts

[–] • 3 pts

Because the medical orthodoxy in the US is pathological in the implementation of poison.

Almost everything they give you is poison. The food we eat in industrialized society is poison. We are taught that poison is good and that which heals is bad.

Then add in vakseenz which are designed to further destroy human health, and finally realize that the cessarean-section ("c-section") is detremental to the health of the newborn because the child bypasses the birth canal which contains vital bacteria necessary for fetal development -- and you've got a perfect explanation of the inreased rate of cessarean-section in the USA.

[–] • 2 pts

Mexico is about 100%. Pick the baby's birthday.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

That makes sense. The doctor who forced me to have a c section is a spic. Those types tend to be violent. She told me she laughed at how much blood I lost. I bet they're doing that left and right in Mexico.

[–] • 1 pt

It's those Aztec psycho genes.

[–] • 2 pts

How much does a C section cost? That will be a big part of the answer.

[–] • 2 pts

Because doctors in the US need to pay off their bills and many are fueled by greed.

[–] • 1 pt

Money. The same in China. I dont know what the stats are, but doctors make more from c-sections, and push hard for them. I had my kid while over there, and they came into the room probably 10 times saying we should have a c-sect. There were no direct health reasons, just "convenience", "mothers safety"...bullshit like that.

[–] • 0 pt

Herpes. Tons of roasties who get knocked up have herpes from riding the cock carousel. I speculate that medical staff recommend c sections in order to prevent law suits when the baby ends up blind from the mother being a degenerate... even way back in her past.

Load more (3 replies)