Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

831

Previously I asked for your arguments against miscegenation. Now I want to know: at what point does miscegenation occur? Or does it occur in degrees?

We commonly refer to 'white' as a race. But isn't this a newer construct, based partly on American mixed-european heritage, partly on the us vs. them posturing of commies, and maybe also long-nose tribe's need for a way to claim in-group status?

Previously I asked for your arguments against miscegenation. Now I want to know: at what point does miscegenation occur? Or does it occur in degrees? We commonly refer to 'white' as a race. But isn't this a newer construct, based partly on American mixed-european heritage, partly on the us vs. them posturing of commies, and maybe also long-nose tribe's need for a way to claim in-group status?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 3 pts

Yes, it's miscegenation. An Anglo-Saxon and a Swede are genetically more similar to each other than they are to a Han, but that doesn't make them the same. As a note, I don't mean to imply miscegenation is bad.

[–] • 0 pt

within white-to-white, the difference is close enough to be okay

[–] • 0 pt

I didn't imply it wasn't. I explicitly stated that I don't think miscegenation is necessarily bad. I could even say that outside of this white miscegenation scenario there are other scenarios where miscegenation would not be utterly terrible.