Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

518

This woman ticks almost all of the boxes which would fit her into my spectrum of who I'd want to hopefully settle down with. She wants at least three kids, is White, intelligent and intellectually stimulating, class act, doesn't take bullshit, definitely isn't a hoe, independent and we just generally get along. She's shown signs of liberal/woke behavior like "love is love" shit and "be whoever you want to be" kind of thought process but no reeeeeing or cunty behavior in that way and honestly most women are liberal minded to some degree so fuck it, life's short, good girls are hard to find, so take what you can eh?

Last night we were out and got onto the topic of differences between men and women because she started talking about this being a "Man's world", so, being inquisitive and open to debate, I went on talking about why this is a "Man's world", using biology as my main argument and that the bottom line is that men are just physically stronger than women for "x" reason and mammals, in general, have a patriarchal hierarchy because nature and such.

It was a long debate, I won't bore you with details, but if she was any dimmer or disliked me more then it probably would have ended in tears because her liberal logic doesn't quite accept reality or biology as a foundation for "social injustice", instead believing that the world is the way it is because it has been taught that men are more powerful than women, and therefore we live in Man's world through nurture rather than nature. She believes wholeheartedly that the world is only the way it is because men (who are at the forefront of science) have molded it to suit themselves and give them the upper hand in society.

I quite easily dismantled her reasoning because it's blatantly stupid woke liberal nonsense, in effect upsetting her but forcing her to admit that she is idealistic. She genuinely said to me that she believes the things she does because she is idealistic. She wants to believe in a world where women and men are equal, through and through, and therefore does not want to hear and/or accept the alternative regardless of how much it makes sense or is in fact easily provable that men are physically stronger than women.

So now I feel as though I'm between a rock and a hard place, because she's obviously indoctrinated and has jew brain rot in her but she's also a good person and mate for a lot of other reasons. Hell, the fact that we even had the debate in calm and openly is outstanding and shows she's capable of conversation, but I don't actually think she's going to shift that much on these views which will only bleed into our children if ever the day came.

Anyway there we go, to be with her or not, that is the question.

This woman ticks almost all of the boxes which would fit her into my spectrum of who I'd want to hopefully settle down with. She wants at least three kids, is White, intelligent and intellectually stimulating, class act, doesn't take bullshit, definitely isn't a hoe, independent and we just generally get along. She's shown signs of liberal/woke behavior like "love is love" shit and "be whoever you want to be" kind of thought process but no reeeeeing or cunty behavior in that way and honestly most women are liberal minded to some degree so fuck it, life's short, good girls are hard to find, so take what you can eh? Last night we were out and got onto the topic of differences between men and women because she started talking about this being a "Man's world", so, being inquisitive and open to debate, I went on talking about *why* this is a "Man's world", using biology as my main argument and that the bottom line is that men are just physically stronger than women for "x" reason and mammals, in general, have a patriarchal hierarchy because nature and such. It was a long debate, I won't bore you with details, but if she was any dimmer or disliked me more then it probably would have ended in tears because her liberal logic doesn't quite accept reality or biology as a foundation for "social injustice", instead believing that the world is the way it is because it has been taught that men are more powerful than women, and therefore we live in Man's world through nurture rather than nature. She believes wholeheartedly that the world is only the way it is because men (who are at the forefront of science) have molded it to suit themselves and give them the upper hand in society. I quite easily dismantled her reasoning because it's blatantly stupid woke liberal nonsense, in effect upsetting her but forcing her to admit that she is idealistic. She genuinely said to me that she believes the things she does because she is idealistic. She wants to believe in a world where women and men are equal, through and through, and therefore does not want to hear and/or accept the alternative regardless of how much it makes sense or is in fact easily provable that men are physically stronger than women. So now I feel as though I'm between a rock and a hard place, because she's obviously indoctrinated and has jew brain rot in her but she's also a good person and mate for a lot of other reasons. Hell, the fact that we even had the debate in calm and openly is outstanding and shows she's capable of conversation, but I don't actually think she's going to shift that much on these views which will only bleed into our children if ever the day came. Anyway there we go, to be with her or not, that is the question.

(post is archived)

[–] • 18 pts

Have you tried not caring what she thinks?

[–] • 5 pts

What she thinks will pass down to my children but if that's a little too dramatic I care far more about what I think and a little Poal infused altruism in a text post helps clear that up more often than not.

[–] • 9 pts

OK, I hear you. If you like her enough, it might be reasonable to try to talk to her.

I would start by agreeing with her. She is absolutely right, this is an unfortunate world where women have had many of their rights and freedoms taken away by men. As a matter of fact, women have never been less happy than they are right now.

We live in a sick society, a society that constantly chastises them for the qualities that make them great, a society that seeks to strip women of their feminine strength. Elements of society are indeed trying to oppress her, and this cannot be overstated, because it is undeniably true. Tell her that you couldn't imagine how hard it is to be a woman today, with society trying to force her to act in unnatural ways, like forcing a round peg into a square hole.

After all, women shouldn't be forced to act contrary to their nature. Trying to make women act in a manner contrary to their nature is one of the sicknesses of our society. But this sick, male driven society, only appreciates males, and tries to make women to act more masculine, because that's the only way they find any use in women; It is purely profit driven capitalist sickness. The more money that can make off of women as laborers, the better.

Ask her if women are much happier today that they were in the past. Most aren't. The present is pretty awful. Ask if she can feel it. Most people can. Something is really wrong with everything, and no honest person could deny it.

Then tell the bitch to suck your dick.

[–] • 9 pts

I red pilled a lib by agreeing. Then weeks later, holy shit, did you read this? And again, and again, and again, spacing it out enough where she looked at me and said I thought we were the good guys, I shrugged, and said, I'm beginning to think we aren't , and that makes me sad. A few more times and she was talking about the jews.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh shiiiiiiiiiiiiiit plot twist!

[–] • 5 pts

A lot of them put that away to find a man during/after covid bs, now that elections are back it’s turning back on and they think that the man they’ve been with will go along with it

[–] • 4 pts

This. The (((tv))) is activating their sleeper cells

[–] • 4 pts

"The slogan ’emancipation of women’ was invented by Jewish intellectuals, and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life, the German woman had no need to emancipate herself. She possessed exactly what nature had given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman.

If the man’s world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman’s is a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content of their lives?

No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and only on the basis of this smaller world can the man’s world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.

We do not consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the man the readiness to safeguard life.

The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation of the functions of each.

It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain the whole community. So our women’s movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National Socialist national community acquires a firm basis, precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical comrades…

Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women’s movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist women’s movement has but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.”

[–] • 1 pt

This guy needs to come back into power please

[–] • 3 pts

Women are retarded children.

She actually sounds pretty enlightened for a woman. Just let her know that you care about her but you know her ideas are not correct and will lead to tragedy if people actually try to live by them.

She'll come around or she won't. Just maintain frame and don't act weak but don't act mean either. Balancing act and such.

I'd like to tell you to dump her and find a based and red pilled woman, but like I said women are retarded. You only have so much time to live and rational women are kinda rare.

I say staying with her and slowly changing her mind over time is the most practical answer.

I wish I had a magical and perfect answer. But I don't 🤷‍♂️

[–] • 3 pts

Easy choice. You wouldn't want your children spewing thay shit so leave her, but, what if she is testing you to see if you're a real man? Tell her you won't put up with that shit and why she is wrong. You will either pass her test and get a submissive wife, or find out that she really is like that and be rid of her.

[–] • 3 pts

She wants to believe in a world where women and men are equal, through and through, and therefore does not want to hear and/or accept the alternative regardless of how much it makes sense or is in fact easily provable that men are physically stronger than women.

It's time for you to have two discussions:

1) You are perfectly ok with inequality where women are better at some things, and men at others. Thank goodness we are because I have seen the squalor bachelors live in, and the incapacity of women to replace a flipping lightbulb. If she wants to idealistically believe that men and woman are equal in all ways, then it's time to put on her big girl panties. The lawn needs mown, the oil needs changed on your truck, and she better be working enough overtime to earn as much as you. You'll be baking some cookies and then effing off to go shopping for things you dont need. Do her a solid and write up your todo list. She'll figure out that equality is both nonsense and a shitty deal about the time she gets to some particularly grueling todo like digging up a busted sprinkler line.

2) Are disagreements resolved through reason and evidence, or fee-fees? If she says reason and evidence, then you'd appreciate she acknowledge the evidence demonstrating her error. If she says fee-fees, idealistically you'll always be correct and never make an error. That would feel great! As long as she wants to use fee-fees to resolve disputes, you feel that she's wrong and nothing will make you feel differently. And if she changes her mind that maaaaybe fee-fees aren't such a good basis to resolve disputes...problem solved.

Both conversation boil down to "I will give you what you ask for, and one of us will learn that we're wrong".

[–] • 3 pts

She will teach your future kids as she believes, or she can accept you as the patriarch and head of household. Arm wrestle her and end the equal strength fallacy in her head. You have the intellectual advantage too that you discovered, after your discussion. Also you have the moral argument since 'love is love' is a distraction from the real issue, which is to falsely equate love and sex. They are not the equivalent, since that leads to 'sex is sex' (which is the pedo agenda). What to do? Can you live the Archie Bunker and Meathead family for the next several decades?

[–] • 3 pts

You're dumber than she is. Imagine being such a retard to think women can have muh stimulating, coherent, objective, philosophical, discovering conversations. Date other men if that's what you want.

You should never let any women teach your children anything, so don't worry about her views contaminating them

Can she cook? Does she have full sleeve tattoos? Has she admitted to being a coal burner? Does she even half-assed take care of her body? Is she aware that you could accidentally kill her if you rough play too hard.

Those are like the only questions you need to worry about

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Interesting, does your wife not teach your kids? I'm curious how your education system works if the women isn't allowed to teach your child anything. Do the kids get 100% of their education from you? Are they getting food grades and know how to farm?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Women have a warped sense of reality ESPESCIALLY if they grew up without a strong father in the house.

The world is an evil place full of evil people. Women are generally coddled and protected throughout their entire life. This is why they shouldn't be allowed to vote. They have no real conception of the horrors of the world.

I legit just had to break up with a girl because she refused to believe that jews hate Jesus, and refused to read statements from the talmud to evidence that fact. Blows my mind. That's their nature though.

Your girl sounds like she's willing to listen and to follow your lead. I wouldn't give up on her. Just keep tactfully casting GENTLE grains of truth at her. Honestly, it sounds like you might have a keeper.

[–] • 1 pt

There are no independently intelligent women, only submissive women with wise husbands who are intelligent enough to guide them to the truth. And there are no genuinely submissive women in the West.

[–] • 1 pt

I have converted one of these women. I had her idiot liberal relatives as an added handicap.

It can be done. Repetitive lessons about real world examples and logic and patience, plus, as said, maintaining frame is your task.

You are the teacher and she is your 2nd grade student.

Load more (8 replies)