Here is a conundrum many Americans will face in the next decade.
Wrong. Going against your morals.
Right. Destroying your morals to feed your starving children.
Here is a conundrum many Americans will face in the next decade.
Wrong. Going against your morals.
Right. Destroying your morals to feed your starving children.
I'm baffled why you would construct such a false dichotomy. Unless you're lazy, it's easy to work to feed your kids. The only way that doesn't hold true is if you're the victim of violence to prevent you from working...and once you're the victim of violence, morality no longer applies. It'd be like asking "Is it moral to do X" to escape a kidnapper. All moral responsibility falls upon the kidnapper, not you.
I'm baffled why you would construct such a false dichotomy. Unless you're lazy, it's easy to work to feed your kids. The only way that doesn't hold true is if you're the victim of violence to prevent you from working...and once you're the victim of violence, morality no longer applies. It'd be like asking "Is it moral to do X" to escape a kidnapper. All moral responsibility falls upon the kidnapper, not you.
(post is archived)